A1 Overview; "Aloe vera is historically and symbolically dubbed the "silent healer" across cultural traditions, and its bioelectric impulses are translated into 432Hz ambient frequencies in sound-healing projects like Aloe Vera Vibrations"
Aloes flowering in a bay window in Southampton U.K. Mine often flower but unlike in their natural environment they do not produce sufficient flower head to make "flower remedies" (after Dr.Edward Bach et.al), this is unsurprising for (as also with crystals) such remedies should be "potentised" in the "in the vernacular".
"This track is created from the natural bio-electrical vibrations of an Aloe Vera plant, translated into gentle tones and blended with soft 432Hz harmonics. The sound carries a calming, cooling energy that supports deep relaxation, emotional balance, and inner clarity.
As you listen, allow the subtle plant frequencies to soothe your breath, soften the mind, and restore a sense of peace within.
A quiet space to reconnect with yourself, nature, and the present moment": https://insighttimer.com/BioMusicVibrations/video-guided-meditations/aloe-vera-vibrations-for-deep-calm-and-inner-healing
"Aloe vera is not a cactus though. It belongs to the Lily family, a relative of onion and garlic. The plant’s Latin name is aloe vera aloe barbadensis, but its common names include burn plant, lily of the desert, and elephant’s gall (“Herbs”). Its thick, spiny leaves grow in a rosette pattern, usually numbering 12 to 16. They are a greyish-green color often with small flecks of white running along the leaves, as are the leaves on my little aloe plant. Three to four of these leaves can be harvested every six to eight weeks without damaging a mature plant, and in these leaves lives the allure of the aloe plant: the gel. Aloe has been described as shrubby, but specimens can look quite grand when they flower. The flowers are yellow and tubular and grow in cylindrical racemes on a stalk that can reach 90 centimeters into the air (“Aloe”). The plant becomes a tower of striking yellow".."Egyptians called it “the plant of immortality,” according to Alasdair Barcroft and his historical account of the plant inFor the people of Mesopotamia, aloe vera was used to ward off evil spirits, an ancient vampire vs. garlic tale. Hindus believed aloe was among the holy plants in the Garden of Eden and dubbed it the “silent healer” (Barcroft 18-19). In that small suburban backyard, in our world of little-girl imagination, we applied the gel to our skin, and though we didn’t know its name then, we understood its power, part of the magic that has existed in minds for millennia.
Aloe vera is known across cultural and linguistic borders as a “miracle” or “magic” plant. Inside the leaves is a colorless jelly-like substance comprising the parenchyma tissue of the plant – the source of all this magic (“Aloe”). I snap off a tip of one of the leaves on my aloe vera and touch the oozing jelly inside. It smells foul, but the gel is thick and wet. It looks soothing and restorative. This gel has been known to heal burns and skin abrasions; it’s a folk and alternative remedy for conditions including asthma, diabetes, epilepsy, and osteoarthritis (“Herbs”). Chemical analysis has clarified some of the mystery surrounding this “miracle” plant, discovering that the gel contains amino acids, minerals, vitamins, enzymes, proteins, polysaccharides and biological stimulators (“Complete”). Today, it’s found in everything from skin products to yogurt": https://hfe-observatories.org/story/natures-healer-the-magic-and-memory-of-aloe-vera/
"
I have found applications for aloe vera that don't immediately appear in the standard literature, such as packing the outside surface of the lungs in aloe gel as a topical treatment for many different respiratory toxin and particulate inhalation impactions and internally for stomach conditions and again following the ingestion of many different toxins and poisons, remember, however, that aloe vera is alkaline and full of water never use if contraindicated and always check the basic protocols (esp. with man made agents whose reactions are not commonly understood) regarding the treatment of any toxin, particulate or poison! The search for a way of properly hydrating damaged lung tissue is, however, surely the dream of many conventional physicians.
Regarding the Vernacular
Below is an example of the amount of flower head an aloe vera can produce in its natural environment.
As flower remedies require unbroken sunshine for the 3-5 hours they take to potentise and it is preferable to cover the surface of the water in the potentising vessel with fresh open flower head (esp. in the case of aloe which opens its blooms progressively) it is materially obvious that aloe vera flower essence should be potentised in the vernacular 🌞 It's profile should be of an essence that specifically deals with the emotional effects of trauma esp. when the physical and emotional aspects are in conflict or synergistic.
Filleting
If you wish to use natural aloe at home you will need to fillet it properly. This is no job for children as aloe leaf is tough and fairly thick so you will need a sharp knife (Nb. I use a straight blade not serrated). There are a good number of filleting tutorials on You Tube, here are a couple (Nb. I cut the end off at the pruned base of the leaf then cut the useable remainder -that with any hope of filleting successfully for useable gel, so you don't use the end- into rectangles slice off one edge at a slight angle, remove the remaining top part of the leaf above the gel then, flattening the leaf I fillet above the surface of the bottom leaf to remove only clear gel, any remaining leaf matter and yellowed gel is then removed -I use a stone board for this against which green spots of leaf matter or yellow slime show very clearly, the board is easy to clean & I keep the yellow matter separate from any gel I consume-):
..and one on gut health:
I try to use a very strict protocol when I ingest aloe because aloe contains non-active B12 a rare bacterium found active in only a number of plant based moulds, dairy & meat products, as Methylcobalamin in reputable supplements and as a yeast extract. One should not consume aloe until any active B12 source has passed through the system and not consume any active B12 until (ideally) the day following consumption. It is also very advisable to use alkaline biased or neutral water with which to "fast" your aloe (by allowing at least two or more hours to digest before eating anything). In totally ideal circumstances one would take the aloe in the morning around/before 10am then drink only water until 2-3pm eating a light snack then a modest evening meal avoiding too much acid, and any B12 sources, also being careful with sugars and leaning towards bitters for any teas or liquids following the fast.
I believe the inactive B12 in aloe vera gel improves reception of active B12 but its actions are blocked when they meet in the gut or in the bloodstream this is why you will feel "blocked" and depressed if you fail to properly follow the protocol (Nb. beware, many products have B12 added, stay away from those).
Aloe applied topically should also be pure gel although I use the outer leaf of the rectangles I cut as a hard surface against which I can squeeze out gel after filleting the top of the leaf. I cut the gel surface diagonally, quarter it then slice the remaining aloe "sacks" again. This gel I squeeze out onto the skin surface using the outer leaf as both a surface against which to compress the aloe sacks and a pad with which to transport the pure gel over my skin as I squeeze the more liquid, viscous gel out of the sacks. I also use my thumb and fingers to help break the sacks of gel as I spread it. This usually results in some cubes of gel remaining on the skin but these can be squeezed too or considered "hors de combat" (from viewing both videos I will also ensure that I don't cut right through the gel when creating these "nodules"). Aloe gel can be tricky stuff to use topically unless you use a liquidiser and my method ensures the gel is transported to precisely where you want it to go, not where it wants to go! #viscoussnitch
Which brings us to topical uses, its use as a burn remedy, scar tissue healer and general skin tonic are well known, however, it is also ideal for healing any soft tissue, muscle, tendon, ligament injury and for all general wound healing esp. when used in conjunction with, but not at the same time as (esp. when utilising fresh gel), herbs like arnica and in-fact any preparation you want to penetrate into the skin as fully as possible. Use it on the hair by first wetting it, toweling off then taking a clean hair brush coated in gel brush the hair and leave the gel on for at least half an hour (Nb. I often leave mine on a lot longer but then I frequent chlorinated swimming pools!).
I believe when applied on a shaved the scalp (or simply up to the hair line in the case of frontal lobe injury) it may also actually help heal brain injuries.
Consuming aloe will also hydrate, mineralise and increase blood flow to virtually any injury anywhere on the body so internal consumption should also be considered when treating external wounds and other such injuries. Internal & external protocols can be employed at the same time in cases where immediate intervention is indicated or the condition is particularly serious.
Ponce de Leon claimed that the Fountain of Youth was in Florida, it is also believed by some that the Seminole Indians of Florida held sacred a spring around which aloe vera plants blossomed and that this was indeed their "Fountain of Youth". Presumably they too eschewed the eating of meat or dairy on days when they "ate the aloe".
Documenting the story of unofficial nuclear proliferation is a tour of the rogues' gallery of international villainy. To do so properly is a long-term project to which few have (apparently), felt able to devote themselves. The entanglements are clear, however, for just as the truth about the purpose and dangers of civil nuclear power have been continually obfuscated and denied the truth about the development and proliferation of nuclear weapons internationally has been carefully concealed under a cloak of secrecy that in reality represents nothing more than the emperor's new apparel.
From my own investigations over many decades I have drawn the conclusion that there has never been a time in human history when such a large percentage of the population were so very ignorant of the kinds of weapons which may be deployed against them by either an openly hostile foreign or actively treacherous domestic state. This may well be a function of the form in the case of nuclear weapons in that the existential nightmare the use of such weapons represents tends to preclude the easy (and more commonplace), formation of rational thought, however, may I suggest that such also represents a powerful denial of the true nature of the concomitant existential nightmare represented by our diminishing unsustainable resources and the effect their use has had on our global environment? Some may argue that nuclear power represents a possible solution to the issue of the CO2 production associated with the use of fossil fuels yet this is false in several regards, quote;
"That
limited and simplistic approach is scientifically and mathematically
incorrect. If we take a good hard look at the carbon-footprint of
nuclear power, we discover that it has the largest carbon footprint
of any energy source other than the fossil fuels. Very large carbon
emissions are generated by various different stages in the production
of nuclear energy, thereby increasing CO2 in the atmosphere. Tons of
carbon emissions are generated by the following activities which are
all necessary in the production of nuclear energy:
MINING
- Uranium (or thorium).
MILLING
– transportation to millworks, taking the raw ore and converting
it to “yellowcake” uranium ore.
CONVERSION
- Construction of the uranium conversion facility, transportation of
the uranium “yellowcake” to a conversion facility, dissolving it
to form UF6, conversion of “yellowcake” to UF6.
ENRICHMENT
- Construction of the uranium enrichment facility, construction of
the cylinders used to transport the UF6, transportation of the UF6
to the enrichment facility, enrichment of the uranium.
FUEL
PELLETS - Formation of uranium fuel pellets, transportation of the
uranium fuel pellets.
NUCLEAR
POWER PLANT CONSTRUCTION - Construction of the nuclear power plant,
with its massive amounts of concrete and steel, which will take
several years of using heavy construction equipment to complete.
Keep in mind that both steel and concrete production are
carbon-intensive.
SUPPORTING
INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS - Construction of the
necessary infrastructure to support the nuclear power plant (roads,
transmission lines, barge canals, etc.)
GENERATORS
- Use of heavy-duty diesel generators to run the cooling system
during routine maintenance, refueling, shut downs resulting from
increased summertime water temperatures, any SCRAM, and power outage
emergencies.
WASTE
STORAGE - Building RadWaste storage facilities, building radwaste
storage containers and transporting the waste to the storage
facilities. Transfering RadWaste from one geographic location to
another, across the country, or the ocean.
WASTE
PROCESSING - Building reprocessing facilities, transporting the
radwaste to the reprocessing facility, reprocessing the radwaste,
building storage for the radwaste generated by reprocessing.
WASTE
INCINERATION - Building radwaste incineration facilities,
transporting the waste to the incineration facility, incinerating
the RadWaste.
WASTE
VITRIFICATION - Building vitrification plants, transporting waste to
vitrification plants, vitrifying the RadWaste involving heating the
materials to very high temperatures.
MONITORING
OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE - carbon pollution generated by monitoring and
guarding the radwaste for eternity.
DECOMISSIONING
AND DECONTAMINATION -decontaminating and demolishing the nuclear
plants, reactors, enrichment facilities, and other support
infrastructure.
ACCIDENTS
- mitigation and clean-up efforts on nuclear accidents-huge carbon
contribution.
DAMAGED
REACTORS AND ACCIDENTS - Building sarcophagus structures around
failed nuclear power facilities. Monitoring, securing and
periodically re-entombing failed nuclear power facilities for all
eternity.
There
are more nuclear carbon-footprint considerations than the ones stated
here, but this list is a good general start. No one source has
actually calculated the carbon footprint for nuclear energy taking
into consideration all of the above sources of carbon emissions.": https://www.arafel.co.uk/2023/03/depleted-uranium-use-is-nuclear-war.html
It
is also true that the production of nuclear weapons (because -as we
have examined repeatedly on Arafel-, it is in order to produce
nuclear weapons that sovereign states feel able to spend the vast
sums they do on -so-called-, civilian/commercial nuclear power
plants), is hugely and disproportionally expensive and in-fact represents only
a loss-leader to our totalitarian systems, quote;
"Britain’s
first new nuclear plant in a generation at the Hinkley Point C site
will face further delay, at a cost of €2.5bn to the French utility
company EDF.
EDF
said the first reactor at the site in Somerset will begin operations
in 2030, a year later than planned – almost 13 years after
construction work began – after a series of delays to the project.
The
latest delay will wipe almost £3bn from the French state-owned
developer’s accounts and take the total cost of building the
nuclear plant to £35bn, or almost double the estimate of £18bn when
it was given the green light in 2016. However, the final cost will be
far higher once inflation is taken into account as EDF gives its cost
estimates in 2015 prices.": https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/20/hinkley-point-c-delayed-to-2030-as-costs-climb-to-35bn
It should be self-evident that if we are spending such vast sums on nuclear power we cannot possibly be making the same investment in sustainable energy production (Nb. anyone who thinks nuclear power is a "sustainable" industry is seriously deluded think of the amount of waste storage -and the length of time such storage will be necessary-, should we only continue production for the next 50 years).
"Thou Shalt not Make a Machine in the Likeness of a Human Mind!" Dune, Frank Herbert
Herbert's admonition rings very true here for when I inquired of Google as to a direct comparison between the investment profile and expenditure of the U.K government with regard to nuclear power with that of (so-called), renewables both the "AI Overview" and the source material suggested simply obfuscated the issue by not providing figures for that into the alternative industry concentrating only on the proposed expenditure on nuclear projects whilst pointedly avoiding a direct comparison with planned expenditure on renewables. This is a very common occurrence with regard to the nuclear industry whose data and public profile are policed more assiduously than (almost?), any other, quote;
Those
of us who have studied these issues are, I'm afraid, very far from
surprised though, in-fact there is an aphorism within the
anti-nuclear community that informs one that; "You can rely on
the nuclear industry for one thing and one thing only lies!"": https://www.arafel.co.uk/2026/02/the-ninth-circle-pt2-truth-about.html
Quote; "AI
Overview
UK
investment in the energy sector is currently characterized by a
"golden age of nuclear" policy, aimed at boosting energy
security alongside massive, rapid investment in renewable energy
.
While renewables like wind and solar have seen costs plummet—becoming
much cheaper to deploy than nuclear—nuclear power is being funded
to provide consistent "baseload" power, which renewable
sources cannot do without storage.
Investment
Comparison: Nuclear vs. Sustainable Energy
Investment
Focus & Strategy: The
UK government has committed £14.2 billion to the construction of
Sizewell C, aiming for it to power six million homes. A further £2.5
billion has been allocated to develop Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).
Conversely, investments in renewables have driven their share of
electricity generation from 3% in 2000 to 42% in 2022.
Costs: Nuclear
projects are notoriously expensive, with Hinkley Point C estimated
at £22-£23 billion and Sizewell C potentially costing up to £38
billion. In contrast, the costs of renewable energy have decreased
significantly, making them generally more cost-competitive, though
they require additional investment in system flexibility.
Economic
Impact: The
nuclear industry generated £6.1 billion for the UK economy in 2021
and employs over 64,000 people. Nuclear jobs are often high-skilled
and long-term, with workers receiving 33% higher compensation than
those in the wind and solar sectors.
Environmental
Impact: Both
are considered low-carbon. Nuclear emits 10-15g/CO2 equivalent per
kWh, which is competitive with wind and solar. However, nuclear
faces challenges regarding waste management, while renewable energy,
particularly offshore wind and tidal, is heavily promoted for
sustainability.
Operational
Reliability: Nuclear
provides a consistent baseload, making it more reliable than
intermittent renewables. However, nuclear projects often suffer from
significant construction delays and cost overruns, unlike
renewables."
Hinkley Point
The industry is also justifiably infamous for downplaying its safety problems and the seriousness of incidents associated with same. Has anyone heard about this for instance? Quote;
"A
small fire broke out today at a partly constructed nuclear power
station in northern Japan,
the third blaze at the plant this month. It comes a week after an
earthquake caused a radioactive spillage at another atomic plant.
The
operator, Hokkaido Electric Power (Hepco), said there was no danger
of a radiation leak and there were no injuries during the incident at
the Tomari plant.
Two
other reactors at Tomari were operating normally, it said.
The
Kyodo news agency said investigators found damage to electrical
wiring and suspected foul play, but the operator was unavailable to
comment.
The
fire came eight days after an earthquake caused radiation leaks at
the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant - which generates the most electricity
of nuclear power stations worldwide.
International
inspectors were due to visit the Kashiwazaki plant in the aftermath
of the quake, in which 400 drums of low-level radioactive waste fell
over, with about 40 losing their lids and spilling their contents.
The
spillage was one of more than 50 malfunctions at the plant in the
immediate aftermath of the quake. The operator, Tokyo Electric Power
(Tepco), was criticised for failing to deal with the blaze and for
initially under-reporting the scale of the radioactive leaks.
"It's the economy stupid!" Indeed for since the oil crisis of the 1970s when the Arab dominated Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), decided to punish the U.S and other western nations for their support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War and embargoed oil supplies to these countries one of the consequences has been that the U.S has increased its support for Zionist extremism as a means of manufacturing consent for the acquisition of major oil fields and their associated production facilities within the region. This marriage of convenience has had major consequences for all those countries once threatened by the flexing of OPEC's muscle entailing a "Zionisation" of politics that has manifested in the total corruption of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation as a bulwark against bolshevism (a threat that now no longer exists), and transformed it into a security service that works on the behalf of the interests of the western elites by supporting their (unsustainable), corporate structure.
The notion of sustainability is key here because it throws a light on the motivations and true psychological profile of those most concerned with the promotion of such conflicts. The fossil fuel resource is of-course non-renewable which presents an awful problem to post-Industrial Revolution regimes whose governmental, legislative and socio-political structures are based almost entirely on the exploitation of such (I hesitate to call them "economies" because -strictly speaking-, they are not, quote;
"..we
can see how closely related the notions of ecology and economics
really are, this seems to indicate that the Industrial Revolution
(esp.), saw a perversion of the language describing
transaction/exchange in order to underpin a Social-Darwinist model of
human evolution, allow this exploitative model to gain ascendancy and
fulfil (esp.), capitalism’s imperial and “manifest destiny”. It
may, therefore, be the case that a misapprehension of the nature of
economic theory has stemmed directly from the exploitation of
non-renewable resources.": https://www.arafel.co.uk/2021/06/a-dangerous-conflation-socialism.html ).
The position our post Industrial Revolution states are now in is, therefore, increasingly desperate in nature something that is shown most clearly by the apparently indeterminate nature of the U.S administration's raison d'etre for their current aggression towards Iran*, quote;
"Regime
change, nuclear threat – or something else? US officials seem
unable to land on one coherent reason for war.
When
the United States launched Operation Epic Fury last Saturday, the
Trump administration had a major communications question to figure
out: how to explain to the American public, Congress, and the world
why it had just started a war with Iran.
During
war time, talking points and propaganda reflexively fly in every
direction, but the Trump administration still hasn’t been able to
land on one coherent answer.
*Although many suspect that the primary motive force on this particular occasion is far more personal in nature, quote;
"According
to this report, the video recording of Bill Clinton raping this
13-year-old girl child was “created/engineered”
by
Israel’s Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations (MOSSAS), “Clothing
Shop Network”
(Магазин/одежды/חנותבגדים)
whose main “organizer/facilitator”
is
the "international man of mystery” Jeffrey Epstein”...
"MOSSAD'S
“Clothing
Shop Network”,
this report explains, was originated in the early 1980’s by one of
the most secretive billionaires in American named Leslie Wexner and whose father (Harry
Wexner—changed from Hagan Wexelstein)
emigrated to the United States in the late 1930’s from/the former
Soviet Union. The
“Clothing
Shop Network” name
itself, this report continues, was derived from Leslie Wexner being
one of America’s top clothiers—and who owns the US-based fashion
retailers L.Brands and Victoria's Secret.": https://www.arafel.co.uk/2016/10/the-horrible-cant-possibly-be-true.html
No matter how distasteful to those who haven't already sold-their-souls the truth is that such activities are considered legitimate tools of statecraft especially by the administrations of those countries which posses atomic weapons.
Entanglement
As with the exploitation of the fears of mankind with regard to alien invasion the fear of nuclear war has enabled the most Machiavellian of policies to be quietly instituted within the regimes of those states who posses nuclear weapons (concomitantly affecting all the other states and peoples on the planet), resulting in an almost ubiquitous Pentagon Paper Mentality establishing and reproducing itself within their populations.
Quote; "Today
Drop Site News is publishing a landmark investigation about the BBC’s
coverage of Israel’s unrelenting assault on Gaza by British
journalist Owen Jones. His report is based on interviews with 13
journalists and other BBC staffers who offer remarkable insights into
how senior figures within the BBC’s news operation skewed stories
in favor of Israel’s narratives and repeatedly dismissed objections
registered by scores of staffers who, throughout the past 14 months,
demanded that the network uphold its commitment to impartiality and
fairness. Jones’s investigation of the BBC has three main
components: a deeply reported look into the internal complaints from
BBC journalists, a quantitative assessment of how the BBC
characterizes the year-long siege on Gaza, and a review of the
histories of the people behind the coverage—and, in particular, one
editor, Raffi Berg": https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/bbc-civil-war-gaza-israel-biased-coverage
Meanwhile the license payers cower under their stones hoping that the "inconvenient truth" will somehow magically disappear.
"It's on account of all the Al-Gore-isms dear!"
It is the concern that oil supplies be assured to the west that has enabled Israel to not only develop but also acquire nuclear weapons, quote;
"..the
Obama administration confirmed "that it is reserving the
right to use nuclear weapons against Iran" for its
non-compliance with US demands regarding its alleged (nonexistent)
nuclear weapons program. (U.S.
Nuclear Option on Iran Linked to Israeli Attack Threat - IPS
ipsnews.net,
April 23, 2010). The Obama administration has also intimated that it
would use nukes in the case of an Iranian response to an Israeli
attack on Iran. (Ibid). Israel has also drawn up its own "secret plans" to bomb Iran with
tactical nuclear weapons: "Israeli
military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be
enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment
facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete
and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busterswould
be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United
States declined to intervene, senior sources said."
(Revealed:
Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran - Times Online,
January 7, 2007) Obama's
statements on the use of nuclear weapons against Iran and North Korea
are consistent with post 9/11 US nuclear weapons doctrine, which
allows for the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the conventional
war theater.*
Through
a propaganda campaign which has enlisted the support of
"authoritative" nuclear scientists, mini-nukes are upheld
as an instrument of peace, namely a means to combating "Islamic
terrorism" and instating Western style "democracy" in
Iran. The low-yield nukes have been cleared for "battlefield
use". They are slated to be used against Iran and Syria in the
next stage of America's "war on Terrorism" alongside
conventional weapons.
"Administration
officials argue that low-yield nuclear weapons are needed as a
credible deterrent against rogue states. [Iran, Syria, North Korea]
Their logic is that existing nuclear weapons are too destructive to
be used except in a full-scale nuclear war. Potential enemies realize
this, thus they do not consider the threat of nuclear retaliation to
be credible. However, low-yield nuclear weapons are less destructive,
thus might conceivably be used. That would make them more effective
as a deterrent." (Opponents Surprised By Elimination of Nuke
Research Funds Defense News November 29, 2004)
The
preferred nuclear weapon to be used against Iran are tactical nuclear
weapons (Made in America), namely bunker buster bombs with nuclear
warheads (e.g. B61.11), with an explosive capacity between one third
to six times a Hiroshima bomb. The B61-11 is
the "nuclear version" of the "conventional" BLU
113. or
Guided Bomb Unit GBU-28.
It can be delivered in much same way as the conventional bunker
buster bomb. (See Michel
Chossudovsky, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO112C.html,
see
also http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=jf03norris)
. While the US does not contemplate the use of strategic
thermonuclear weapons against Iran, Israel's nuclear arsenal
is largely composed of thermonuclear bombs which are deployed and
could be used in a war with Iran. Under Israel's Jericho‐III
missile system with a range between 4,800 km to 6,500 km, all Iran
would be within reach." Go
to: https://www.alainet.org/en/active/40327
for
full and extensive article.
*Italics/underline mine."..
"As the U.S has spread the B-61
"bunker-buster" around Europe Israel's stick-to-beat the
Americans with has been the Israeli nuclear program, the supply of
smaller U.S designed bombs has no doubt been intended to ensure both
"correct" somewhat "limited" use by Israel and to
limit the possibility of either failure or explosive accident (which
is how the U.S has unofficially justified supplying them to the
Israelis to the international community -the implication also being
that these bunker-busting weapons are primarily considered as for use
against Iran-).": https://www.arafel.co.uk/2018/03/update-on-unofficial-nuclear.html
Quote; "AI
Overview
the B61-12
nuclear gravity bomb is a "dial-a-yield" weapon, allowing
the military to adjust its explosive yield before launch
. This redesigned
bomb, intended for both strategic and tactical use, features variable
yield technology with a range of approximately 0.3 to 50 kilotons of
TNT. It is designed to be highly accurate.
Key
Details About the B61-12:
Variable
Yield: Operators can select from multiple yield options to
tailor the destructive force for specific targets.
Purpose:
As a modern iteration of the B61 series, it is designed for
precision, potentially lowering collateral damage compared to
higher-yield, older weapons.
Capability:
It is designed for external carriage by high-speed aircraft.
Testing:
The B61-12 has undergone extensive testing, including with the F-15E
Strike Eagle, confirming its functionality, arming, and targeting
capabilities.
The
B61-12 is part of a broader U.S. nuclear modernization effort, with
some debate regarding its impact on non-proliferation*."
*Italics mine.
Cut Throats Walking the Razor's Edge
It seems it was not in the interests of the corporate elite to make terms with Iran regarding its nuclear program, quote;
The
JCPOA ended some of the sanctions on Iran while suspending others,
subject to waivers. These include waivers of oil sanctions
implemented in January 2012, which require periodic re-certification.
Throughout 2017 Trump contemplated not re-certifying, and thus
effectively pulling out of the deal.[25]
According to Jarrett Blanc of the Obama administration, since the
JCPOA is not a treaty but an agreement between several countries, it
has no formal provisions for withdrawal, but a member of the deal
could stop complying with its obligations.[25]
Following
Trump's denial of the deal, the European Union's foreign policy
chief, Federica Mogherini, said the JCPOA was a firm decision and
that no single country could break it. She proposed a "collective
process" to preserve the deal, saying, "This deal is not a
bilateral agreement ... The international community, and the European
Union with it, has clearly indicated that the deal is, and will,
continue to be in place."[26]
French President Emmanuel
Macronwarned Trump not to
withdraw from the deal, and told German magazine Der
Spiegel that doing so "would open the Pandora's box. There
could be war."[27]
The Global Times, a Chinese newspaper, wrote that America's
reputation as a major power would be undermined in the eyes of the
world if it reneged on a deal simply because of a transition in
government.[28]
*It's possible I don't trust nuclear powered states any further than I can run away from them, however, proportionality is certainly an issue here if, as all the evidence suggests, Israel has already facilitated the use of its own nuclear weapons by supplying them to the Saudis under the (get this), "Good Neighbour Policy" and allowing them to be used on the poor Yemenis (no coincidence of-course that the Yemeni Houthis are supported by the Iranian regime).
I strongly urge you to view the video evidence for yourselves:
Nb. The type of pixilation seen on much of this footage is a result of ionizing radiation interacting with the technology of digital capture, quote;
Quote; "AI
Overview
Atomic blasts (and
high radiation environments) cause a "static-like"
pixelation or "dancing white dots" effect on digital
cameras (digicams) because high-energy ionizing radiation (gamma
rays, particles) hits the image sensor directly.
How
Radiation Causes Pixelation:
Sensor
Saturation: Digital camera sensors (CMOS/CCD) detect light
by converting photons into electrical charge. High-energy radiation
acts like an intense, invisible light, overwhelming individual
pixels and forcing them to maximum brightness, creating white or
coloured spots on the image.
"Hot
Pixels" and Noise: The radiation causes "noise"
that resembles static, where the intensity of the noise increases
with the strength of the radiation field.
Bit
Flips: In extreme environments, the gamma radiation can
cause "bit flips" in the camera's memory, corrupting the
image file or creating random, distorted pixels.
Visible
Tracks: If particles hit the sensor at an angle, they can
create short, bright streaks or lines, rather than just single-pixel
dots.
Chernobyl/Nuclear
Sites: Footage taken inside high-radiation areas, such as
the Chernobyl sarcophagus, frequently shows this dancing, pixelated
static because the radiation is constant and intense.
Nuclear
Test Films: Early nuclear test films often appear black and
white because they used specialized, heavily filtered, and
slow-acting film to prevent the intense light of the blast from
destroying the image (or the camera).
Space/High
Altitude: Similar effects are seen in cameras in space due
to cosmic rays hitting the sensors.
This
phenomenon is not a failure of the digital zoom, but a physical
interaction between ionizing radiation and the camera's imaging
technology."
Profiling
Quote; "Explaining
Israel's aberrant behaviour is not that difficult either, spoiled
children who are rewarded when they behave like mavericks develop an
inflated opinion of themselves and
they make mistakes.
No matter how hard the Deep State attempts to obscure the use of
tactical nukes by the "Israel ibn Saud" alliance (incl.
indulging in the wholesale breach of the human rights of the people
of Yemen by trapping them within a war zone the Powers that Be don't
want the prying eyes or open ears of aid agency workers or
journalists to penetrate -an apparently somewhat desperate and
panicked reaction-), the truth will out but let's hope it does so
before another and bigger theatre of war is opened in either Korea or
Iran and the initial flash of the Yemen strike is obscured by the fog
of a larger nuclear war.
There is however a more subtle
but equally plausible narrative, clearly the opinion analysts and
manufacturers (both inside and outside), of The State Dept. have been
exercised by the questions (and this for some time); "Does the
public (both at home and abroad), now consider a limited nuclear
exchange (or the asymmetrical use of such weapons in specific
circumstances), to be a different animal to that of a full strategic
exchange?" ..(and), .. "Can we make the limited
"battlefield" (a somewhat loose term as applied here), use
of lower yield nuclear weapons acceptable?" So perhaps the PtB
thought; "We'll let the Israelis drop one of theirs on Yemen and
see if anyone jumps!" Outlandish? Not really when one considers
just how much time and energy has gone into both the continuing
Korean War and preparing for possible conflict with Iran, to put it
in cold economic terms; "It's worth a lot more than are a few
more dead or outraged civilians in one of the poorest countries in
the world" (that's "to them" of-course). Maybe it's a
bit of both though (as usual in-fact when it comes to U.S foreign
policy), with the right-hand not really knowing what the left-hand is
doing.
Politicking is just that,
however, international
law states
that if the Saudis and Israelis dropped a tactical nuke on Yemen this
was a criminal act and a case should be brought against them and
heard under the fullest of international and public scrutinies.": https://www.arafel.co.uk/2018/03/update-on-unofficial-nuclear.html
Alamogordo
This is not the first time that nuclear proliferation has driven a clandestine international agenda either, quote;
"..it
is necessary to examine the chronology of the events which lead to
the first Gulf conflict. Saddam Hussein (a former ally of The West),
had undoubtedly been attempting to develop a viable nuclear weapon
prior to “Desert Storm”, his reactors (with the French
technicians still in them!), were bombed by the trigger happy
Israelis precisely in order to prevent him from doing so. America
(“as usual” terrified of their Frankensteinian
creation and anxious
to secure the oil supply they were being denied by his regime), were
at that time being thwarted in their ambitions by an international
community which was far less subservient than the “United
Nations” which are now living far more deeply in the shadow of the
post Yugoslavian conflicts effect on the notion of non-intervention
in the domestic affairs of nation states that has so coloured
international relations in recent decades (esp. with regard to The
Middle East). Even George Bush senior had been
unable to break the deadlock, however if one can “suspend
disbelief” one can imagine that both The Pentagon and the CIA had
been devising strategies with which to remove such obstacles to
action (of which Mr. Bush was of-course fully aware), one of which
was to provoke or “encourage” an attack on one of his oil rich
neighbours (something that Saddam would “jump at” at the time in
order to refill his treasury following Iraq’s bloody and costly war
with Iran). In order to facilitate this it would be necessary to
somehow deceive Saddam as to America’s true interests in the region
as not even he would risk direct conflict with the most powerful
military machine on the planet. Such a deception would however risk
showing America’s hand to the international community in a way that
even Bush senior felt unable to justify and therefore these plans
remained shelved until such time as the political climate became more
favourable. Around this time however certain documents were stolen
from the United States which were to provide precisely the right
impetus with which to change the weather. It seems that although
America had secured the necessary technical documents which would
enable one to produce a viable fusion weapon (something Saddam did
not have the industrial or financial ware-withal to do in any-case),
the original Alamogordo trinity test specifications for a fission
bomb were not held under such tight security and
were stolen (“rumour
has it” by an Asian “freelancer”), and then sold to the Iraqi
regime. Bush senior then “green-lighted” the operation that would
lead to “Desert Storm” (go
to: http://rense.com/general69/41.htm “How
Bush Tricked Saddam into Invading Kuwait “The April Glaspie
Interview”). As you can see this information is extant (thank you
Adel Darwish and Gregory Alexander –“Unholy Babylon” Gollancz
1991-).": https://www.arafel.co.uk/2013/09/desert-storm-saddam-bomb-and-almagordo.html
Paper Tigers?
The problem with Pentagon Paper Mentalities though is that they are not paper-tigers! They are extraordinarily dangerous and should they be allowed to continue (esp. beyond any "laissez-faire" sell-by-date), they invariably dish out severe maulings to those who ignore their presence and a nuclear mauling is something that should terrify all of us, furthermore, as is understood by many, any open nuclear confrontation on any scale will irreversibly change the nature of both national and international socio-political landscapes. That this might further enable oppression (esp. within the nuclear armed states), is a factor we cannot afford to overlook when attempting to prevent such an eventuality; "Qui bono?"
.JPG)
.JPG)
